Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al Declarations aka LIES under Penalty of Perjury

· Read Defendant Alex Khavin’s LIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

· Read Defendant Fidelia Shillingford’s LIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

· Read Defendant Chris Liasis’ LIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

· Read Defendant Michelle Sullivan’s LIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela, Bob Marley, Marcus Garvey and so many others “paid it forward” for me. Hopefully, I will be able to “pay it forward” for others.

· Read Helen Dubowy’s - The Main Aider and Abettor Declaration

Defendant Fidelia Shillingford’s “Declaration” in Support re: 89 Motion for Summary Judgment - (Docket # 93)

Defendant Chris Liasis’ “Declaration” in Support re: 89 Motion for Summary Judgment - (Docket # 94)

Defendant Michelle Sullivan’s “Declaration” in Support re: 89 Motion for Summary Judgment - (Docket # 95)

Defendant Helen DuBowy’s “Declaration” in Support re: 89 Motion for Summary Judgment - (Docket # 96)

· Read Declarant Kimberly Dauber’s LIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

Declarant Kimberly Dauber’s “Declaration” in Support re: 89 Motion for Summary Judgment - (Docket # 97)

· Read the biased/so called “investigator” - Defendant John Vega’s Declaration

Defendant John Vega’s “Declaration” in Support re: 89 Motion for Summary Judgment - (Docket # 98)

· Read Declarant Baruch Horowitz’s LIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

Declarant Baruch Horowitz’s “Declaration” in Support re: 89 Motion for Summary Judgment - (Docket # 99)

Defendant Thomas Poz (did not submit a Declaration)

Defendant Philippe Quix (did not submit a Declaration)

PENALTY OF PERJURY - 18 U.S.C. § 1621

Whoever in any DECLARATION, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

· More on Defendant Thomas Poz

· More on Defendant Philippe Quix

CLICK HERE TO SEE MY RESPONSES TO THE BLATANT LIES

Defendants Declarations aka LIES under Penalty of Perjury | THE TRUTH | THE EVIDENCE | SHOP CandiceLue®

Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Material Facts under Local Civil Rule 56.1 - (Docket # 90)

· Read the LIES in the Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Summary Judgment

Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Summary Judgment - (Docket # 91)

· Read the LIES in the Defendants’ Statement of “Undisputed” Material Facts

CLICK HERE TO SEE MY RESPONSES TO THE BLATANT LIES

Defendant Alex Khavin’s “Declaration” in Support re: 89 Motion for Summary Judgment - (Docket # 92)

Defendants’ Declarations aka LIES

Under Penalty of Perjury

In the case of Lue v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al (U.S. Supreme Court: Case # 19-260)

THE CLEAN HANDS DOCTRINE

The clean hands doctrine is a rule of law that someone bringing a lawsuit or motion and asking the court for equitable relief must be INNOCENT of wrongdoing or unfair conduct relating to the subject matter of his/her claim.”

In other words, JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al bringing a motion and asking the Court for equitable relief must be INNOCENT of wrongdoing, THE CRIMES OF PERJURY AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.