The Latest

In the case of Lue v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al (U.S. Supreme Court: Case # 19-260)

Home  |  My Story  |  Meet Candice |  JPMC Culture of Racial Discrimination  |  Corrupt Judiciary  |  The Latest   |  Contact   

Defendants Declarations aka LIES under Penalty of Perjury  |  THE TRUTH  |  THE EVIDENCE |  SHOP CandiceLue®

Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela, Bob Marley, Marcus Garvey and so many others “paid it forward” for me.  Hopefully, I will be able to “pay it forward” for others.

Copyright © 2017 - 2025 CandiceLue.com.  All rights reserved.

SEPTEMBER 6, 2017

Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Vacate Judge Alison J. Nathan’s August 11 and August 21, 2017 Prejudicial Orders and to Restore to the Court’s Docket My Opposition/Responses to the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment which was PROPERLY Filed on July 31, 2017 (USCA Case Number 17-2751)

SEPTEMBER 8, 2017

On September 5, 2017, I finally received a copy of Judge Alison J. Nathan’s Order of August 11, 2017 (ALMOST ONE (1) MONTH LATER).  I also received a copy of her August 31, 2017 Order at the same time.  However, to date, I have not received a copy of her August 21, 2017 Order – incompetence, incompetence.  In any event, after sorting out the craziness sent to me from the “Chambers of Incompetence” aka Judge Alison J. Nathan’s Chambers – Her Order of August 31, 2017 attached to her Order of August 11, 2017/the Defendants’ attorney’s Letter Motion of August 1, 2017 (this Order should not have been attached to either of these), Her Order of August 31, 2017 which since she is “attaching” should have been solely attached to my Response to her August 21, 2017 Order but instead was attached to the Defendants’ attorney’s Letter Motion of August 1, 2017/her Order of August 11, 2017.... After the “sorting out”, I am now feeling a bit dizzy!  Click to see.

OCTOBER 16, 2017

Because of Judge Alison J. Nathan’s BIASED and CORRUPT Orders of August 11 and August 21, 2017 where ALL my Opposition/Responses to Defendants, JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al’s Motion for Summary Judgment to dismiss my lawsuit with prejudice were stricken from the Court’s docket by her because my said Opposition/Responses MADE IT AS CLEAR AS DAY that my Civil and Constitutional Rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 were violated by the said Defendants and that the said Defendants LIED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY in their Motion for Summary Judgment to have my lawsuit dismissed, I had to seek the intervention of the Appeals Court (Second Circuit Court) to vacate those biased and corrupt Orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan by way of a Petition for Issuance of a Writ of Mandamus.  With that said, I am currently awaiting the Appeals Court’s ruling on that said Petition.  (Click anywhere in “September 6, 2017” below to read the Petition.)

NOVEMBER 2, 2017

On September 1, 2017, I filed an “EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY PENDING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND FOR A TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATIVE STAY PENDING FULL CONSIDERATION OF THIS MOTION” in The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to vacate Judge Alison J. Nathan’s BIASED and CORRUPT Orders of August 11 and August 21, 2017.

Pursuant to Rule 21(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Petition for Issuance of a Writ of Mandamus MUST BE GIVEN PREFERENCE OVER ORDINARY CIVIL CASES -   Meaning that Judge Alison J. Nathan must wait on the ruling from the Upper Court, The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which should include removing her from this case for both being BIASED and for JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT (for changing the rules on her Individual Practices after I submitted by Opposition/Responses to the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment so that she could prejudicially rule against me and in favor of the multi-billion dollar Defendants, JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al).

With that said, Judge Alison J. Nathan’s Order of October 31, 2017 is not only disingenuous because in response to her said BIASED and CORRUPT Orders, I filed a Petition for Issuance of a Writ of Mandamus in the Appeals Court to have her Orders of August 11 and August 21, 2017 vacated but Judge Alison J. Nathan must FOLLOW THE RULE OF LAW aka Rule 21(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.   

(See a copy of the said Petition for Issuance of a Writ of Mandamus that I filed in the Appeals Court on September 1, 2017 and which I SENT A COPY TO JUDGE ALISON J. NATHAN’S CHAMBERS in the “September 6, 2017” post below.)

NOVEMBER 11, 2017

The equally CORRUPT U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has denied my petition for Issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to vacate Judge Alison J. Nathan’s BIASED and CORRUPT Orders of August 11 and August 21, 2017 by disingenuously ignoring the fact WHICH WAS AS CLEAR AS DAY that my Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights are being violated by the said judge.

I knew this was coming when I saw the CORRUPT AND BIASED JUDGE, ALISON J. NATHAN’s October 31, 2017 Order after being quiet for two months.  The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the Upper Court), The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, County of New York (the Lower Court) and the multi-billion dollar powerhouse, JPMorgan Chase & Co. attorneys are in CAHOOTS…..

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit claims that: “Petitioner, pro se, [Candice Lue] has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the district court to accept her over-long opposition to the defendants’ summary judgment motion.”  Really???  to accept my OVER-LONG opposition to the defendants’ summary judgment motion?????? 

How about I filed the said petition because the BIASED AND CORRUPT JUDGE ALISON J. NATHAN is denying me my Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional Rights to present my argument and evidence against the powerful multi-billion dollar defendants, JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al in court because my said argument and evidence MAKE IT AS CLEAR AS DAY that my Civil and Constitutional Rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 were violated by the said Defendants, that my Claims of Employment Racial Discrimination and Retaliation are valid and that the said Defendants and their attorneys LIED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, WHICH IS A CRIME, pursuant to 18 USC § 1621 and 1622?  For the record, pursuant to 18 USC § 4, I have reported THIS CRIME to BOTH the Lower and Upper Courts/Judge Alison J. Nathan who have a duty (that they have sworn to uphold) to take action.

Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 56.2 and 12.1:  “IF YOU HAVE PROOF OF YOUR CLAIM, NOW IS THE TIME TO SUBMIT IT” and Rule 12(d) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: “….ALL PARTIES MUST BE GIVEN A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT ALL THE MATERIAL THAT IS PERTINENT TO THE MOTION”.

Judge Alison J. Nathan updating her “Special Rules of Practice in Civil Pro Se Cases” to include “page limits” 10 DAYS AFTER I submitted my Opposition/Responses to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in order to rule in favor of the multi-billion dollar Defendants, JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al and against me the poor, Black, pro se Plaintiff is nothing short of BIAS and JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT.  Further, no where in the U.S. Constitution or in the Rule of Law does it state that the “page limits” of a judge’s Individual Practices take precedence over evidence.

There are NINE (9) defendants in the lawsuit Lue v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al (1:16-CV-03207) and the said defendants are using ONE (1) attorney so that they can speak in ONE voice to LIE and OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and the CORRUPT JUDICIARY is helping them to do so (SAD)! (See my Petition for Issuance of a Writ of Mandamus in “September 6, 2017” below - DISGRACEFUL!)

November 13, 2017

My Response to Judge Alison J. Nathan’s DISINGENUOUS October 31, 2017 Order (Docket # 129).  Why disingenuous? Because Judge Nathan already knew that the equally CORRUPT U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with whom the lower Court/Judge Nathan and the attorneys for the multi-billion dollar Defendants, JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al are in COLLUSION was going to deny my Petition for Issuance of a Writ of Mandamus.  (Click any where in “November 2, 2017” below to see Judge Nathan’s disingenuous Order.)

November 28, 2017

My Response to Judge Alison J. Nathan’s Order of November 20, 2017 (Docket # 132)..........

From the moment I read Judge Alison Nathan’s Order of November 16, 2017, I knew it was a FARCE.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Justice Thurgood Marshall [who this Courthouse is named after] must be rolling over in his grave) in COLLUSION with the District Court/Judge Alison J. Nathan should NOT be denying me the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights afforded me under the Constitution of the United States of America.  

December 15, 2017

Response to Judge Alison J. Nathan’s Order/“Court Docket Summary” of December 4, 2017 (Docket # 135)….

Pursuant to Judge Alison J. Nathan’s OATH OF OFFICE, 28 U.S. CODE § 453, she must preserve the INTEGRITY of the Judiciary by DENYING the NINE (9) Defendants’ CRIMINAL Motion for Summary Judgment to dismiss my lawsuit with prejudice.      

December 18, 2017

Response to Judge Alison J. Nathan’s Order of December 4, 2017 (Docket # 136)…. 

The only message this lawsuit is sending to Black and other Minority employees who are experiencing Employment Racial Discrimination and Retaliation at the hands of wealthy and powerful corporations such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. is “SHUT THE HELL UP!”  Thanks to judges like Judge Alison J. Nathan (APPOINTED TO THE BENCH BY THE FIRST AND ONLY BLACK PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES) who use their robes to protect and shelter these wealthy and powerful lawbreakers.

January 16, 2018

Motion for Judge Alison J. Nathan to DENY Defendants’ Attorney, Anshel Kaplan’s Letter Motion dated January 12, 2018 (Docket # 138)….  

First off, AND PER the CLEAN HANDS Doctrine Rule of Law, “someone bringing a lawsuit or motion and asking the court for equitable relief must be INNOCENT of wrongdoing [PERJURY] or unfair conduct relating to the subject matter of his/her claim”.

NEXT PAGE  |   2   |   3   |   4