|
Candice Lue’s Mission Statement
To fight the multi-billion dollar powerhouse, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its eight (8) managers who UNLAWFULLY perpetrated Employment Racial Discrimination and Retaliation against me and who with the help of the CORRUPT JUDICIARY are now trying to have my lawsuit dismissed with prejudice by way of a fallacious and mendacious Motion for Summary Judgment. (“Dismissed with prejudice” means that my lawsuit be dismissed permanently. A case dismissed with prejudice is over and done with, once and for all, and can't be brought back to court - Bearing in mind that this “dismissal” would be based on the LIES, some of which were made under Penalty of Perjury, contained in the Defendants’ said Motion for Summary Judgment.)
I have provided hundreds of pages of evidence to the Court dispelling the plethora of LIES harbored in the said perpetrators’/tortfeasors’ Motion for Summary Judgment for which they need to be punished to the full extent of the law for LYING UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY (click here to read the BLATANT lies and click here to read my Opposition/Responses to those said lies).
However, in her quest to shelter the multi-billion dollar Defendants, JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al from their CRIMES of Perjury and Obstruction of Justice and to prejudice my Employment Racial Discrimination and Retaliation lawsuit, Judge Alison J. Nathan who was appointed to the Federal Bench by the first and only Black president of the United States of America, President Barack Obama has ordered that ALL my Oppositions/Responses which include eight (8) Affidavits and almost 500 pages of evidence (everything totaling less than 1,000 pages) in Opposition/Response to the NINE (9) individual Defendants’ CRIMINAL Motion for Summary Judgment be STRICKEN from the Court’s docket with the frivolous reason being, are you ready for this?...... It is overly burdensome for the perpetrators/tortfeasors of the Employment Racial Discrimination and Retaliation against me to read and reply to (click here to see my first Response to Judge Alison J. Nathan’s biased August 11, 2017 Order, click here to see my Addendum to this said Response and click here to read my Response to Judge Alison J. Nathan’s prejudicial Order of August 21, 2017).
My lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al consists of NINE (9) individual Defendants and TEN (10) Causes of Action. So, the Defendants’ attorneys whining that my Oppositions/Responses to each of the NINE (9) individual Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (totaling less than 1,000 pages) to dismiss my lawsuit against them with prejudice is “overly burdensome” for them to read and to reply to is just a cop out as the only thing “overly burdensome” about my said Oppositions/Responses is the evidence stacked up against them that has made it AS CLEAR AS DAY that my Civil and Constitutional Rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 were violated by JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al, that my Claims of Employment Racial Discrimination and Retaliation against the said Defendants are valid and that six (6) of the eight (8) Defendants/Declarants LIED under Penalty of Perjury, A CRIME pursuant to 18 USC § 1621.
Anyone of reasonable mind can see that Judge Alison J. Nathan’s arbitrary striking of my said Oppositions/Responses from the District Court’s docket is GROSSLY unfair and prejudicial. First, it cannot be reasonable and/or logical for Judge Nathan to impose the same page limit for a Memorandum of Law in Opposition that she would allow for a case in opposition to one (1) Defendant upon a case in opposition to nine (9) individual Defendants where each and every one of the said Defendants has specific and different Causes of Action against them and each and every one of the said Defendants is motioning the Court to dismiss with prejudice, the said specific and different Causes of Action against them.
Judge Alison J. Nathan’s Order is a clear violation of my Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights to Procedural Due Process. Click here to read the Judicial Misconduct Complaint I filed against Judge Alison J. Nathan which was dismissed by the COMPLICIT and equally CORRUPT Second Circuit Court of Appeals and click here to read the Petition I filed to have my said Judicial Misconduct Complaint reviewed by the Judicial Council as it should have NEVER been dismissed. Also, click on “The Latest” above and go to pages 3 and 4 for the latest updates.
The “Fight” is on. My inspiration is in my footnote.
“In order to preserve the integrity of the judiciary, and to ensure that justice is carried out in each individual case, judges must adhere to high standards of conduct” - York v. United States 785 A.2d 651 655 (DC 2001)”. |
|
Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela, Bob Marley, Marcus Garvey and so many others “paid it forward” for me. Hopefully, I will be able to “pay it forward” for others.
Copyright © 2017 - 2025 CandiceLue.com. All rights reserved. |
|
For taking a stance against being treated as the “help/house slave” by a racist JPMorgan Chase manager, JPMorgan Chase fired me. In addition to reporting the matter to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), see the stance I took against Employment Racial Discrimination at: https://candicelue.com/My_Stance_Against_Employment_Racial_Discrimination.pdf |
|
EMPLOYMENT RACIAL DISCRIMINATION & RETALIATION
Lue v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
(U.S. Supreme Court: Case # 19-260)
|
|
It doesn’t matter your race and/or your financial status, as a U.S. Citizen, you are entitled to FAIR JUSTICE in a U.S. Court of Law. DEMAND IT! |
|
I have filed a Defamation of Character lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al as the TRUTH about my Employment Racial Discrimination and Retaliation lawsuit against them must come out! Read the Complaint at: https://candicelue.com/JPMorgan_Chase_Defamation_of_Character_Complaint.pdf Also, click on “The Latest” tab above and go to pages 3 and 4 for more. |
